Is it worth assuming a 3% mortgage instead of getting a new loan?

By the AssumptionHub team · Last updated

Usually yes, if you can cover a good share of the seller's equity in cash. On a $350,000 balance at 3%, principal and interest are about $1,660 a month, against about $2,844 for a new $450,000 loan at 6.5%. Over the first five years that's roughly $93,000 less in interest.

If you have to finance the whole equity gap at a high rate, the payments end up close to a new loan's, and the longer closing may not be worth it.

The comparison

The same $500,000 home, bought two ways:

Assume 3.0% loanNew loan at 6.5%
Loan amount$350,000 (25 yrs left)$450,000 (30 yrs)
Cash at closing (before costs)$150,000 equity gap$50,000 down
Monthly principal + interest$1,660$2,844
Interest paid in the first 5 years≈$48,900≈$141,900

Taxes, insurance and mortgage insurance are excluded. Illustrative only, not a quote.

The assumption needs $100,000 more cash up front, but saves about $1,180 a month. If part of the gap is financed with a second loan, the savings shrink. See the equity gap examples.

When assuming makes sense

When a new loan may be better

Frequently asked questions

Is assuming a mortgage cheaper than getting a new one?

Monthly payments are usually much lower when the assumed rate is 2–4% and today's rates are above 6%, but you need more cash at closing to pay the seller's equity. Compare monthly payment and total interest, not just the rate.

Do I keep the low rate for the whole loan?

Yes. You take over the existing fixed rate and the remaining term.

What are the downsides of assuming a mortgage?

Larger cash needs for the equity gap, a slower closing (often 45–90 days), and fewer homes to choose from. FHA loans also keep their mortgage insurance terms.

See assumable homes for sale

Browse homes with assumable FHA and VA loans, with the rate, balance and estimated monthly payment on every listing.

Search assumable homes